Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
The decisions taken by the leaders will impact the growth of an organization. Every person has their own point of view. History has shown us from time to time the impacts of decisions taken by some powerful leaders around the world. I strongly believe that while making such a decision, one must consider the past, which will definitely help to make a better decision.
For instance, Gandhi is known as the 'father of Nation' in India. He was a leader who led the freedom movement in the Nation. Many of his predecessors opted to gain freedom by waging war against the British army, only for them to get defeated, which resulted in the death of many patriots. Gandhi, with all this experience in front of him, opted to protest peacefully. Gandhi used to perform marches from city to city, the famous 'Dandi' march was a notable one. He was finally able to get freedom for Indians with his decision of protesting without any war.
Another instance, Thomas Alva Edison invented the electric bulb. He was successfully able to get the bulb to glow in his 100th attempt i.e, he had failed 99 times. Every time he had considered the result of the previous tests that were carried out. This was key in his success. Similarly, if an Enterprise is failing to get the projected revenue for the current financial year, the leaders in the company must look at the history of events to understand the trend. This will definitely help to make a better if not the best solution.
As each and every person has their own vision, the decision taken will reflect their vision. With all the above examples, it is clear to say that the events that have occurred in the past will help the leaders of an organization in delivering the intended results and henceforth help in taking the Enterprise to the next level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | zzk81 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Venkateshwar | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- "Because the future will be dominated by technology, we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students. If our students take these classes, they’ll all be able to get high-paying programming jobs and lead fulfil 53
- Science and technology will one day solve all of society's problem. 50
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 58
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, if, look, similarly, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69085173502 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44016861552 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6135198841 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6111111111 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469444097485 0.243740707755 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0118662438148 0.0831039109588 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241657201045 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0273923451401 0.150359130593 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00864916254617 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.