correct
When it comes to the question that how we treat in a meeting or classroom when the speakers say something wrong, it brings up a controversial doubt. opinions vary from one person to another. Some of then hold the opinion that they have to interrupt the teacher and inform them to correct their mistake while some of them think this is better to say their mistake after everyone is gone and some of them prefer to do not say something about the mistake. I think in this kind of situation it is more suitable to correct the mistake made by the lecturer. I will explicate my reasons behind this through the following essay.
The first thing that immediately comes into mind is that it is auditors' right to receive correct information from the lecturer. For example, when a student hears incorrect things from his or her teacher and corrects the teacher's mistake it helps other students to not be confused later if they read or hear something different from their teacher's speech.
The second reason that makes me hold this belief is that the participation of auditors in this way will be increased. For instance, when someone interrupts the speech and wants to correct the mistake, other students can convey their opinions about the mistake and since they participate in the subject they can readily learn and memorize the subject.
To wrap it up, if we take a glance into the advantages of correcting the mistake right away, it will be soon recognized that it is more worthwhile as auditors get the correct information and they can say their opinions and participate in the subject.
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 60
- The college years are the best time in a person’s life. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 66
- TV advertisements 60
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- Chaco Canyon in New Mexico which was enormous stone buildings 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Opinions
...ng, it brings up a controversial doubt. opinions vary from one person to another. Some o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g different from their teachers speech. The second reason that makes me hold thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...readily learn and memorize the subject. To wrap it up, if we take a glance into ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 275.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80363636364 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54354733745 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501818181818 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6898936451 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.1 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233285622837 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10374734105 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982085564436 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171319212889 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636762034193 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.