the big gap between the rich countries and the poor
Nowadays, it is believed that the disparity between wealthy and impoverished countries has been greater than in the past. This essay would illustrate the main catalysts of inequality and practical solutions to address this issue.
It is undeniable that there are several reasons resulting in this inequality. Firstly, the difference in policies for economic development could lead to a big gap between rich and poor nations. While councils from rich countries have created more precious opportunities to enhance human living standard based on good offers for well-paid jobs, space-age technology advances or entertaining services, the government from poor ones have been encountering with solutions for the scarcity of careers, food, water and the vast danger of natural disasters and wars. Secondly, there are not much financial supports for developing nations from others. In fact, the developed countries would not donate a big sum of money on the developing ones which they could not take any benefits of. For example, countries such as Togo, San Marino, Mozambique would not turn to the rich ones like America or France because of the low-quality of resources and the disability of affording the national debt.
As a result, practical solutions should be launched to tackle this issue. The first attempt to adjust the economic policy in each country would be highly recommended. It is crucial that there be a coherent strategy about developing the potential competence of a nation. For instance, if a country has prospects for manufacturing rice, improving the rice products via technology will be its top-priority to reach the best outcome. In addition, all the countries should engage in global organizations such as WTO, FDA… which could help them in economic progress. This is a leading contributor to sustainable development all over the world instead of economic inequality.
In conclusion, the dichotomy between the rich and the poor is becoming more and more dramatic, if the governments do not take immediate action, it is going to grow in the future as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | lemaina201 | 84 | view |
- 20/01/2017: Nowadays, young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls. Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nowadays, people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons for and effects on family and the society they live in? 84
- : It is better for college students to live in school than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- the big gap between the rich countries and the poor 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32628398792 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90230293523 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570996978852 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1469840073 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272485705685 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783280477647 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101149587635 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14717681093 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792929909198 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.