20/01/2017: Nowadays, young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls. Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In our time and age, the shopping over-indulgence in youngsters deems to be a common sight. Personally, I believe that this could impose several detrimental impacts on young consumers and the society they live in.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that shopping addiction at a juvenile age is the main culprit for practical issues. Firstly, young shopaholics are exposing themselves to the diversity of advertisement and products in shopping centers that drives their desire to excessive consumerism. Admittedly, financial troubles would be one of the feasibly negative consequences if unnecessary items are unconsciously purchased by spendthrifts. In addition, it is time-consuming that they spend the majority of their pastime on shopping, instead, participating in sensational outdoor activities. Secondly, the profligate lifestyle gives rise to numerous drawbacks in human society. From commodity manufacturing to packaging process, wasted materials and overproduced goods squandered could be the catalyst to the redundancy of landfills.
On the other hand, recreation and stress-free lifestyle are considered as the top priorities when individuals go shopping. This is the best way for those who are in the hectic schedule to let off steam after intensive working days. Noticeably, the autism rate would be in the deceleration if youngsters invariably reach community destinations as shopping malls. Furthermore, this tendency not only bolsters the acceleration in consumption and commerce but also facilitates government to tackle the higher rate of unemployment. For instance, more and more blue-collar workers are hired for working as a product bearer while the white-collar counterparts could be campaign-makers for marketing and sales.
In conclusion, young individuals should efficiently offset their time and personal budget on shopping rather than being over-immerse in the extravagant lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | torontoontario | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | ludovicag | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | lemaina201 | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | Tarunsuri020 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Amin Amiri | 73 | view |
- : It is better for college students to live in school than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 100
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to class offered on campus. Do you think it is positive or negative? 84
- Nowadays, people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons for and effects on family and the society they live in? 84
- the big gap between the rich countries and the poor 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86428571429 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41652646137 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646428571429 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9244607863 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14552774852 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470725321873 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484097280121 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995584729629 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440949970618 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.