Global transportation has escalated the cost of the country. Describe the advantages and disadvantages
Recently, global transportation has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the advantages and disadvantages of it?". Whereas it is a widely held view that global transportation increased the cost of the country, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, global transportation is bound up inextricably with trade, which indicates it leads to both revenue and country's progress. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between transport systems and goods export as well as an exponential increase in profit. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of international airlines is correlated positively with not only developed countries but also economy spurt.
Within the realm of global transport, without the slightest doubt, transportation cost attribute to more network, in that it would come down to rail road, air plane, and international policy. A salient example of such attribution is intercontinental transport, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take business world for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint limited boundaries problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to marketing, goods distribution, and even products import. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of global transportation in economic down turn.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of it outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Rafia Jawad | 75 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-12 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-04-28 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2024-02-15 | Hasnain | 77 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 77
- Some people prefer to play team sports, while other prefer to play individual sports. Discuss the advantages of each. Then indicate which you prefer and why? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?OrDo you think card-less society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 80
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 77
- Company top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to make any decisions. Discuss. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economy standpoint, global tran...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries but also economy spurt. Within the realm of global transport, wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsportation in economic down turn. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8661971831 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3508030937 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665492957746 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2480033005 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240277590451 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721299926423 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795256145471 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138644430505 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109500649888 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.