Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Scientific innovations have led to this current technologically advanced modern world where there is nothing impossible. Although scientific research and developments are crucial for betterment of mankind and all the beings, they are not always conducted with sheer motive of good cause. I completely agree with the above statement that government should prohibit some researches done with a wrong intention. For example, researches on nuclear weapons, human cloning, bio-weapons need to be deterred.
Scientists conduct research to give to the world a beautiful innovation, which can ease human life. However, there may be persons with evil motive to misuse those innovations. For example, research regarding nuclear energy is to be conducted for the development of alternative source of energy; but some might use this as weapons to destruct the world like nuclear attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki of Japan. The attack caused havoc, causing serious effect on health of all living beings for many generations.
In addition to this, research on human cloning should also be restricted. People might use it otherwise. For example, what if humans are made in laboratory and then start smuggling them for purposes like body parts, prostitution, slavery. Many people argue: not only human cloning is against the nature, but it will also be used wrongly.
Some people might argue that researches on nuclear weapon, bio-weapons are to be carried out with full government funding rather than clamping restrictions on them, as these are the tools for self-defense. They protect any nations from invading other intruders and keep them at bay. But weapons are not a solution to the threats of interlopers. Violence is not a solution; forging consensus among people only leads to the genuine resolving of problems. In summary, of course, scientific researches and innovations are of utmost importance for the advancement of today’s world; however, all researches should not be encouraged by the government. Government should vigorously disallow the researches that can be of potential threat to the world later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have filed a formal complaint, indicating that an average of 98 people out of 100 are happy with the 50
- Last week, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not ye 55
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 77
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine."In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park, with abundant numbers of each species. However, in 2002 only four species of am 43
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 70
Comments
this is my first ever issue
this is my first ever issue writing. Please do comment so that i can improve later.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all living beings for many generations. In addition to this, research on human c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...st the nature, but it will also be used in a wrong way. Some people might argue that resear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 757, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of potential threat to the world later.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, for example, in addition, in summary, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39577039275 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90338770909 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567975830816 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9612840217 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168936248368 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560799791953 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633260453964 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111096529429 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698269514958 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.