Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
In recent decades, selecting students in education system still attracts public attention for many reasons. Although other perspectives tend to encourage schools to group students as well as the same-ability, plenty of evidence suggests that the opposite is true.
There are a number of reasons why different academic ability brings a myriad of good views. First, in classes of mixed competencies, children can have the best opportunity to enhance their ability by interacting and communicating with their peers. For example, a literature student can communicate with mathematics student and share his or her knowledge, which taking them into advance levels in a variety of subjects. Second, Competition and challenge play a vital role for many students, on this occasion, the incentive for weaker students is trying to study hard as their classmates. In fact, either a linguistics student or a Mathematics student, they could improve themselves in as many subjects as he or she likes.
On the other hand, grouping students based on the same ability also brings the net beneficial as well. Initially, this enables teachers to prepare materials or tools to teaching easily. For instance, teachers can provide students the same materials and methods, which saves teachers’ times. In addition, with this system, students tend to study with confidence and self-esteem since no one is made them feel inferior by his or her peers. In other words, the emotion of outstanding students feel less reliant on weaker students when they student as the same manner.
In conclusion, though mixed-ability should be promoted, by leading the academic into high degree, streaming students also brings substantial merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Heng Sophat | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Meet2607 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | tahmeed1993 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | smokey | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- Topic: In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of Subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s 61
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s world? 84
- Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 86
- Many people believe that schools should teach Children to become good citizens and workers rather than independent individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tially, this enables teachers to prepare materials or tools to teaching easily. F...
^^
Line 9, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by his or her peers. In other words, the emotion of outstanding students feel les...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... they student as the same manner. In conclusion, though mixed-ability should...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4606741573 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91517642477 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1483811426 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.153846154 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268084292551 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955209017212 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377586117415 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157492936495 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348114343693 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.