Lectures given by teachers in universities used to be the only way of teaching students, however, nowadays technology has evolved and made it possible to study online. This causes many people to believe that the lecture system will not be needed in the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Replacement of traditional classrooms with online classes is becoming popular now. But the reliability in new technology is still continuing as a questionable thing for the majority of the courses. However, I believe that the online study would seem appealing for the working-class category, and in rare cases, it would be a productive option to depend.
To begin with, it cannot be denied that online facility had enabled numerous working-class people to continue their higher education. Fundamentally, this was launched for adults, who stay far away places and do work at the same time. This is because of the convenience to attend class through the internet, irrespective of geographical barriers and time constraints. Hence, this idea was accepted by a myriad of population and they avail the benefits of this approach to educate themselves or to upgrade their employability skills. Moreover, several unemployed and educated youth had joined this platform to provide classes with less investment. This is what we can see on YouTube, anyone can upload educational videos without investing money and in return, they would receive an income as per the quality, thus increased viewership.
Nevertheless, the advantages which brought to certain people's life, this method is not advisable for mainstream education at school and college. It is argued of the age of students at school and college is too young to educate via the internet. While compared to conventional teaching classes, online way of teaching does not provide much intensive learning atmosphere and adequate guidance, especially for high professional courses. Therefore, it is most recommended for matured students.
To conclude, from the aforementioned facts and reasons, it is clearly evident that, the people who reap the positive effects of internet classes are mostly working-class population. Despite the growing demand for this system, it never causes to undermine the requirement of lectures of teaching staff at the primary, secondary and tertiary level of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | vinay kadam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Greeshma vs | 96 | view |
- Something in the airport delayed you and you have missed the flight. Write a letter to customer service manager about it. In your letter sayWhat delayed you?How this missing flight affected you?What you would like airport to do about this issue? 89
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Being a celebrity can bring many benefits and problems. What are the problems and what solutions can be taken? 70
- Lectures given by teachers in universities used to be the only way of teaching students, however, nowadays technology has evolved and made it possible to study online. This causes many people to believe that the lecture system will not be needed in the fu 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or the majority of the courses. However, I believe that the online study would se...
^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve option to depend. To begin with, it cannot be denied that online facility...
^^
Line 13, column 243, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'undermining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: undermining
...demand for this system, it never causes to undermine the requirement of lectures of teaching...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51582278481 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04927355606 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645569620253 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5744025013 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139350088411 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427076993395 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371616633677 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835045619632 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162782539074 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.