Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Public health, a major concern for governments and people, has been a matter of many controversies in recent years. While it is believed by some that providing more sports facilities is the best means to guarantee good public health, others argue that this is not the best solution and other measures yield more positive effects. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion
On the one hand, many opine that the provision of more sports facilities is the best way to ensure enhancing public health. Not only does this reduce the high costs of using sports facilities, but it also would make them highly accessible to the public. It is the expensiveness of sports infrastructures that hinders many from regular usage of them. Were more sports facilities provided, the increased supply would make them more economical, making people more willing to use them. Moreover, being far from these facilities, many people find doing sports time consuming and enervating. Furnishing people with more of these facilities would significantly increase their accessibility, encouraging more people to use the facilities more often.
On the other hand, many opine that a high-quality healthcare system plays a more significant role in terms of the betterment of public health. Though regular physical exercise is a great way to fight against some diseases like diabetes and high blood pressure, there are myriad illnesses that require much more than doing sports. Take diarrhea as an example that exercising can by no means help cure it. Vaccination campaigns, medical check-ups, and health education classes, cost-effective and easily managed solutions, can yield a better result. Polio, one of the deadliest diseases in the world, for example, has been fully eradicated by vaccination. Furthermore, since society comprises of many different age groups from infants to seniors, it is not possible to ensure the participation of all of them in sports.
In conclusion, although the provision of more sports facilities might encourage more individuals to do physical exercise by offering more accessibility and affordability, I do believe that ensuring a high-quality healthcare system plays an indispensable role in terms of enhancing public health.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that the government should provide free education at every level However some say individuals should pay for their university education Discuss both views and give your opinion 82
- Excessive consumption of sugar causes many health related issues. Some people believe the government should control population’s sugar intake while others think people themselves should be responsible for their sugar eating habits. Discuss both views an 73
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide. What is the cause of this? What measures can the international community take to meet this demand? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...vaccination. Furthermore, since society comprises of many different age groups from infants ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...Furthermore, since society comprises of many different age groups from infants to seniors, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36516853933 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96318758844 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7912012632 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237857583044 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847707888599 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692490265796 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155262498421 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710777891188 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.