Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is a backbone of a nation and without the support of the professors, the quality of education will not increase. However, a plethora of people contents that university professors already get enough salaries from the universities and others disagree with the statement. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I personally believed to increase the quality of education university should raise the salary of the professors. I feel this way for several reasons I will expound subsequent followings.
To commence with, raising the salary for the professors will increase motivation. As a result, they will be more focused toward the student and their research work. Moreover, they need diligent work to achieve academic, teaching and research success. After several years of working, they finally reach that position. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in college, it was quite common to receive an email from the professors. They sometimes answered our email in the middle of the night and also give a suggestion for the exam. Therefore, how they are tried to help the student and active in their work. Thus, I believe that if the salary will increase they will be more motivated and improve their teaching style more.
Furthermore, in modern days with this salary sometimes it is difficult to afford a house, children education, mortgage etc. Thus, they are getting another per-time job to support the family. As a result, they are being less focus on their research, student and from their goal. For instance, I have a brother who was a lecturer of a university. He was really interested in teaching career and research. But, after completing the PhD he joined the multinational company because of the large amount of salary. With this salary, he can now easily support our family which was not possible with the university job.
To recapitulate, I am of the opinion that to improve the quality of education university should more conscious to the professors because they are the ideal for our society. To improve the standard of education they required more support.
- tpo 48In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for ex 75
- tpo 39At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the 71
- tpo 47Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs we 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your a 77
- In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15% over the last three years, whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small, general practice firms. Even though large firms usually 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1661971831 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83833535541 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518309859155 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7192297674 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7391304348 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4347826087 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198534491576 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544994108688 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065334102753 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136262416301 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714370680448 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.