Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There is a controversy about the use of animals in medical research and testing. As in medical research, animals have long been become a standardized test for new medicines and vaccines. However, some people argue that using animals in any kind of testing for serving human beings is unethical. Both views will be discussed in this essay.
There are various reasons that can explain why testing on animals are the most probable and effective methods. First, mammals and humans are descended from common ancestors, thus, share the same set of organs such as heart, kidneys and lungs. Indeed, animals are also susceptible from common human-like diseases like cancer, diabetes and heart diseases. Experiment directly new medicines on animals can certainly help researchers find out the adverse effects early, thus help to create a more effective medicine. Second, compared to the number of animals that we humans eat every day, the number of animals used for research is significantly smaller. It can be considered as a small price to pay for advancing medical progress.
Opponents of animal testing often argue that this kinds of testing are cruel and unethical. In fact, animals can suffer like humans do, thus, they wonder why we refrain from experimenting directly on humans but let it happens to animals. Another argument is, in several cases, medicine that was tested on animals might not be as effective as it is in humans. However, as far as I am concerned, animal testing is essential, it is not only useful for humans but it also brings the same value to the animals itself. Without it, some infectious diseases can cause the death of millions of creatures if proper vaccine was not applied.
In summary, I believe that using animals for medical research is essential. It brings the immense amount of benefit to both the animals itself and human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Vijitha00 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | myra124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | Tieulinh | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | Amrit H Kaur | 89 | view |
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter 85
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works using a computer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 73
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 46, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ents of animal testing often argue that this kinds of testing are cruel and unethica...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, in fact, in summary, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05161290323 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57029375551 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551612903226 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1715969003 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1176470588 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800495546121 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033607095589 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348693266877 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597207874634 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244288902824 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.