Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.
Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.
It is undeniable that to provide sufficient food, human beings are consuming environmental resources in destructing volumes, like using harmful pesticides to increase the yield or constantly constructing irrigation systems. Some individuals advocate that it is necessary to develop agriculture at the expense of the environment, since eliminating hunger is the primary contributor to a better life. Reasonable as it sounds, it is all but certain to me that the environment is also imperative and we should always put the environment in the first place.
To begin with, the sustainable development of the environment is the premise of agriculture advancement. Without a healthy ecosystem, modern agriculture is doomed to fail on account of lacking sufficient resources. For instance, the overuse of harmful pesticides has already turned plenty of fertile fields into barren soil, causing the distinction of many animal species used to living there. What’s more, there comes more consequences, the quality of cultivated land has been destroyed leading to the dramatic decline of crop yield. Within a few years, the place which used to be covered by shinning green plants will become a barren saline-alkali land suffering from deterioration. Thus, the dream of boosting the boom of agriculture will never come true and global starvation remains to be a problem that humans cannot tackle with.
Secondly, the protection of the environment will bring tremendous benefits which will help solve global hunger. In other words, the prosperity and development of agriculture and the environment can be simultaneous, which means there is no need to sacrifice any one of them. There are many innovative eco-friendly agricultural programs, like the plantation of organic food and the cutting-edge irrigation system, which succeeded in maximizing the crops yield and minimizing environmental harm. Besides, instead of overusing harmful chemicals, people are now prone to invent novel chemicals posing no threat to ecosystems. The government has also been paying attention to the novel agriculture techniques, encouraging farmers raising domestic animals following nature. Therefore, we can easily conclude that the promoting of a sustainable environment will exert positive influences on modern agriculture.
Admittedly, we contend that global starvation has been an urgent issue of all time. The government has been sparing no effort to come up possible solutions. It is very hard for the leaders of the country to balance between environment and modern agriculture. Nevertheless, as I demonstrated above, the environment is an essential ingredient making up of the earth and we should never disregard it.
To sum up, it is time we protect the environment without any hesitation. Make ways to balance the profits between the environment and agriculture is the smartest choice.
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems of the present and the future, people should learn from the past 90
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 3
- Patience is usually the best strategy. We should be patient rather than take action right now. 90
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.0752688172 396% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60520607375 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19327371245 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568329718004 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4544433094 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.454545455 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288096797404 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834856608384 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203080185037 0.0737576698707 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231377739645 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.344955408001 0.0645574589148 534% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.