The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from people they lead
While is seems to be a compelling argument that the best leaders would want and would encourage feedback from the people they lead in order to successfully lead people, it may not always be plausible to implement and would also depend on the quality of feedback one gets.
Encouraging feedback from the people is absolutely essential in identifying target areas that need to be worked on. Take a very small scale example of a student society. A student society always runs surveys at the end of the semester in order to engage with their members and in order to assess how well the society has been able to cater to the needs and wants of their members. The best leaders of student societies are not those who only encourage feedback from people but also act on the feedback to make improvements in the society for the following semester. Encouraging feedback opens up different channels of communication in order to discuss innovative ideas that could be taken forward. The relation of a principle investigator with his or her laboratory is one such situation in which this can be practiced. Without feedback and discussion from the people the group leader leads, one cannot identify what ground level science needs working on. This can be extended to any sort of administrative position. Administration is viewed as the “leaders” and among the paper work and the admin, in order to be able to successful address issues, the leaders need to encourage feedback from the people they lead.
Having no feedback or communication channel between leaders and the people can be deleterious for society. Historically we can draw on examples from monarchies and dictatorships to illustrate this point. The then leaders, be it a monarch such as Loius of France or a dictator such as Mussolini, had no feedback and did not encourage feedback and this hierarchical structure where there was no communication has had disastrous effects on the course of history.
Indeed one could argue, in governing a country, it may not be feasible to assess the target areas that need working on as a society through mere feedback from the citizens and that what matter to individuals may not align with what may benefit the society as a whole and under this circumstance, encouraging feedback or not makes no difference to the sort of leader one is or may become. Often, feedback is taken as a joke. Take feedback on the internet for example. There are countless trolls and bots out there that hinder the process of collecting feedback. Even besides the trolls, often people may give critical feedback but have no alternatives or solutions. For example, complaining about the state of poverty in a country on a feedback form does no good for the leader trying to address the issue. However, if one can give constructive criticism of a poverty related policy that he or she thinks is not working on ground levels that can be modified or replaced with something better, that is the sort of feedback that the best leaders should encourage and act upon.
On the whole, the argument that the best leaders are those who encourage feedback from those they lead is true, however, the quality of feedback and criticism needs to be addressed in the argument as getting feedback that is not constructive would not change the sort of leader one can be.
- “Allowing our children to spend hours a day IM’ing and employing social media is bound to impede their social skills as they enter adulthood and the workforce.” 66
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora.“Medical experts say that only on-quarter of Corpora’scitizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora’s citi 83
- The state school-board association sent this note to its constituent school-board members.“It is clear that the proposed 10 percent cuts to state aid affect poor districts more than wealthy districts. If the statewide average cut per student is $500, we 77
- to get a better sense of the recreational needs of the community the teeburg town Board sent a questionnaire addressed to the head of household in every home in the town the board asked a series of questions designed to zero in on residents recreational p 69
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...Encouraging feedback from the people is absolutely essential in identifying target areas that need t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...uld be taken forward. The relation of a principle investigator with his or her laboratory...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ous effects on the course of history. Indeed one could argue, in governing a country...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, sort of, such as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2776.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90459363958 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80051163847 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427561837456 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.8691023837 60.3974514979 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.19047619 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9523809524 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451610169724 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143264738621 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137426179851 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312839818197 0.150359130593 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116995752857 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.