The chart below shows the expenditures of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the expenditures of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

The chart indicates the quantity of currency that purchasers expended on many typical kinds of goods in france and uk in 2010. Those goods are cars, computers, books, perfumes and cameras.

As is illustrated by the chart, both france and uk have the highest amount of money in purchasing cars in 2010. Specifically, british using a round sum in terms of cars, namely 450.000 pounds. france is the country also had an approximate expense on this item with 400.000 pounds. In contrast to the goods-cars, perfumes is the product which occupied the lowest quantity in uk, under 200.000 pounds whereas the lowest disbursement in france belonged to cameras, at 150.000 pounds.

As the chart reveals, the second highest expenditure in british is books, approximately 400.000 pounds while france just spent 300.000 pounds consuming it. Together with books , computers is the second highest outgoings in france, nearly 400.000 pounds whereas uk expended less money on this goods, at 350.000 pounds.

In conclusion, both of the two countries have their own priority products so as to purchase and comsume

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-25 mbn250 11 view
2023-07-10 hxyav 56 view
2023-07-10 hxyav 67 view
2023-07-07 baoquyen1906 67 view
2023-06-23 vishvesh 11 view
Essays by user Trần Hồng Khiếm :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: France
...n terms of cars, namely 450.000 pounds. france is the country also had an approximate ...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pounds consuming it. Together with books , computers is the second highest outgoin...
^^
Line 17, column 288, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ounds whereas uk expended less money on this goods, at 350.000 pounds. In co...
^^^^
Line 23, column 75, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ntries have their own priority products so as to purchase and comsume
^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y products so as to purchase and comsume
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36723163842 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66770536939 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7957998953 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1596098031 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717459272544 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530191238451 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106725128495 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387869054701 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.