TPO 41. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
It goes without saying that in today's world, the ethics value have been changed significantly compare to past. While some people believe that the teachers would recieve more respects among the people in the past; However, the others hold the view that they get more respects nowadays. Personally, I am the opinion of the former group's point of view. The reasons substantiating my standpoint are explored in the following paragraph.
To begin with, most of people in the past were illiterate and they did not have any access to the source of knowledge and information, Thus they would see the knowldege as a noticable value and they respect to the teachers as the owners of this precious value. To elaborate, a large group of parents in the past would not pay attention whether their offspring go to school or not and as a result a vast amount of people in the past was illiterate who could not gain their knowledge in different subjects via studying the book, thus the teachers as the persons who were the owners of a value which is knowldege have a high social statues and respects.
Moreover, the Internet eases the access of the people to remarkable source of information and knowledge, and as a result it leads the drop in the value of knowledge, and in the consequnces the teachers' value. To elucidate, it is crystal clear that every person in the era of technology has a kind of library in their cellphones and laptops and as repercussions they do not need to ask teachers as educated persons in a certain field in order to solve their problems. Therefore, as there are no need for asking the teachers their status will be low and as a aftermath they will be less appreciated.
As shown above, considering all the reasons and points one could conclude that the teachers had the high social status in the past. It is because the people were not be educated in the past and the access to the information is easy and there is no need for teachers nowadays.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Maryam Madson | 61 | view |
- TPO 41. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 60
- TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 21 3
- TPO 22 3
- TPO 54 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ollowing paragraph. To begin with, most of people in the past were illiterate and they di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 556, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eachers their status will be low and as a aftermath they will be less appreciated...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68390804598 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62814495874 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0369101423 48.9658058833 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.181818182 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6363636364 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241082077076 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086451359015 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058979835697 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144313831107 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347541690095 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.