Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
No one cast a shadow of doubt on this fact that all members of any groups should help each other to be succeeded, and teamwork get achievement solely by cooperating entire members of group. While many people believe that targets of a project should move toward, which other members or all members of group are inclined, others refute this claim, and they think it is better all members of teamwork should consider the view of member who helps group more than other members , and they should move toward his/ her idea. I, personally, concur the former viewpoint for two cogent reasons, which I will elucidate in the following paragraphs.
The first reason that points out is that if helpful member of group make mistakes, all benefits of group will endanger, in which they undergo considerable losses. To be more specific, a great deal of research studies have shown that one of the potential loss for every company and teamwork activities is that when they only rely on one idea and a thought. Moreover, it is not rational, in which we just concentrate on one way for getting triumphant because in the modern world, we cannot examine and repeat just one way for success. In fact, it might this person does not have enough information about incoming dilemmas, or he/ she makes decision about one of the important of decisions about project in inappropriate situation. Then, the result of this decision absolutely has hazardous outcomes. My father experience is a compelling example of what I mean. He worked in a company, which exported many materials. Unfortunately, the boss of company decided to take an immense contract with another company without conferring with the other members of company. After contracting with this company, they understood it was counterfeit. Therefore, almost more than 70 percent of company's capital lost. Apparently, had boss of the company made decision by consulting of origin's members of company, they would have never been bankrupted.
The further subtle reason is that when all crucial decisions about a project perform just by one member, other member lose their motivation, and they dissuade to participate in this subject. To clarify, when a project establishs by a team, they would like to be active, and present their idea for progressing of their project. On the other hand, when they have considerable information and innovative and fresh ideas about this project, but other never outweigh these ideas and notions, they differentiate about their targets. Moreover, they lost their trust and belief to group. Besides, they think this member of group who makes decision about all aspects of problems is dictator who never pay attention to other members of group. As a result, it is better all members of team cooperate in the project, and they be freedom to operate their ideas for promoting of the entire project. In this situation, they struggle considerably, and their commitment about their project increases more than when they do not participate in the aims of projects, or other members of team overlook their ideas.
To wrap up, contemplating all aforementioned remarks, we reach the conclusion that it is better we consider thoughts and ideas of other members of group. This is because we will be able to prevent unexpected problems and losses, which happen by making decision by only one person, and because we will be able to encourage other members of group to participate in this project.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-27 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | zg1122 | 86 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | neriman | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | sadafara | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People holding different views cannot achieve successas a team. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team, does it have negative effects on their lives? 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... who helps group more than other members , and they should move toward his/ her id...
^^
Line 3, column 1262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the company made decision by consulting of origins members of company, they woul...
^^^
Line 7, column 817, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am cooperate in the project, and they be freedom to operate their ideas for promo...
^^
Line 11, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f group to participate in this project.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, as for, i mean, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2888.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 572.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04895104895 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68925631169 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465034965035 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4777989475 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.565217391 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8695652174 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237634998425 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722812718314 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06415411747 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176314798847 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584828351904 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.