Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
In order to survive and outstand in today’s developing and competitive world, besides knowledge, people also need to have other extra skills like, for example, leadership. Contrary to popular belief that people are born leaders, I will vehemently declare that any person, regardless of inborn skills, who has the desire will eventually become a good leader through hard work and a lot of practice. I will explore the most discernible reasons for my viewpoint in the following body paragraphs.
To commence with, I strongly belief that through hard work we can open all doors we want and acquire any skill we want. There is nothing unachievable in this world and as we know “ if there is a will there is a way”. In other words, there are a myriad of ways of acquiring and specializing in new skills if a person has a distinct goal and is ready to realize it at all costs. For example, people can read the biographies of striking leaders, get to know with their experience, learn about the most important features that are characteristic of them and try to reveal the way, which helped them to become a successful leader. It goes without saying, that such accomplished leaders were once an ordinary people like others and not all were born with that skill in their blood.
Admittedly, a person can be born with leadership skills, but it is of no use if he does not have appropriate knowledge to guide people. More specifically, people will never rely on and follow the once who lack competence and knowledge. So, in my opinion it is much better to be assiduous and ambitious than to have a strong talent but be lazy. My experience is a compelling example of this. Early in my childhood, I was rather a shy and obedient girl. I was doing quite well at school and was the best at class; though, I did not outstand with my organizational and leading skills. However, with the passage of time, I came to the point that I had to come out of my shell and start to think as a leader. I tried hard, read a lot of books about famous people, attended particular meetings and discussions and the desirable result was inevitable.
To sum up in the light of the reasons mentioned above I am strongly of the opinion that every person is able to become a leader and should not necesserely be born that skill.
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. 70
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT SCIENTISTS MAKE THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIETY. OTHERS THINK THAT THE CONTRIBUTIONS FOF ARTISTS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT. 76
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment— doing things they like to do—rather than doing things they should do. 76
- People learn things better from those at their own level, than from those at a higher level. 90
- Foreign visitors should pay more money than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... way'. In other words, there are a myriad of ways of acquiring and specializing i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, well, for example, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64563106796 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71881932258 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53640776699 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5849520138 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.588235294 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2352941176 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115814554267 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338811826984 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406326300833 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711771297207 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246778987851 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.