Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high-level degrees
Do you agree or disagree?
The dispute of whether or not physical labour should be paid as well as an intellectual job has become a burning issue in modern society. Some people believe in the proportionality of efforts required for physical work in comparison with intellectual, others, as well as me, disagree with them, which will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, intellectual labour seems to be harder. Many physical occupations, such as conveyor workers, require skills which generally are developed until it is entirely automatic after some time. As a result, efforts for this job decrease significantly, whereas intellectuals have to find new solutions permanently. Further, it has have been proved that intellectual job seems to be more demanding for the human body due to high influence on physical as well as mental condition. In other words, people who work intellectually tend to be more exhausted as physically as mentally at the end of workday, whereas others are not. Finally, intellectual workers often are able to execute a physical job, due to the low level of required skills. For instance, some companies organize a special event, when intellectual workers help physical workers for one day. Unfortunately, the opposite situation would be a challenge.
However, some people may claim that physical labour should amount to intellectual work due to intellectuals never spend so much energy as physical workers. Moreover, physical work influences negatively on human health so should not be paid less. Nonetheless, the job market seems to respond clearly to the dispute and it is not in favour of physical labour.
All in all, despite the view that any labour should be paid equally to intellectual one, I would like to claim that the latter seems to require more skills and efforts to archive high level degree.
- Finding it hard to remember important facts and figures? Improve your memory in 10 weeks with our Memory Course. Places are limited and the course is available for only a short time.Apply in writing to:You see the above advertisement for a course designed 81
- In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes. What are its problems. 11
- Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high-level degreesDo you agree or disagree? 73
- A colleague at work is organizing a goodbye party which you are not able to attend. Write a latter to him/her.In the letter you should:Explain reason why you cannot attendgood memories you have spenthow you will stay in touch 73
- More and more people are opting for ready-made food instead of freshly cooked food. Do this development has more advantages over disadvantages? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The dispute of whether or not physical labour should be paid as well ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... solutions permanently. Further, it has have been proved that intellectual job seems...
^^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
... are not. Finally, intellectual workers often are able to execute a physical job, due to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llectual one, I would like to claim that the latter seems to require more skills ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17627118644 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95306578482 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8784075677 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.071428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289743637429 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101098394548 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710252089516 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189311245479 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608349415508 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.