The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 2001.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts illustrate the fluctuation in total annual spending school in the UK in each 10-year as 1981, 1991 and 2001. Firstly, Teacher’s salaries were always main expenses of school in these years, the highest rate in school’s expenses at 40% in 1981, 50% in 1991 and 45% in 2001. Secondly, cost that had the most fluctuation in total spending school was insurance fee, likely in 1981, school only spent 2% for insurance fee, 3% in 1991 but rose by 8% in 2001. Cost of furniture and equipment decreased from 15% in 1981 to 5% in 1991 but went up 23% in 2001. In while that, fee for resources changed opposite with change of cost of furniture and equipment, in 1981 school’s spending rate was 15% and rose up 20% in 1991 and then reduced by 9% in 2001. Finally, school spent other workers’ salaries decreased year by year, in specially, 28% in 1981, 22% in 1991 and 15% in 2001 but this was the second of high rate in total annual spending school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Tran Thi Gia Ngoc | 56 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summaries the information by seclecting and reporting the main features, and ma 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 2001.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television? 61
- What are the pros and cons of using public transportation? 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5625 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62993313517 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517045454545 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.1860935775 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287037515339 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170597261342 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819250332948 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287037515339 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.