Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Environment pollution can no longer be managed by individuals unless a real change is made at the government level. Proponents say that pollution cannot be controlled by individuals and government should bring in some real change whereas the opponents say that pollution can be managed by individuals without any government intervention. In this essay I will explain why pollution can be managed by Individuals without any change at government level.
Though environment pollution is too alarming it can still be managed by individuals without any change from government side. Irrespective of any change at the government level it is the actions of people and their awareness about pollution can help manage it. For example, every individual should realize the damage caused by throwing garbage in oceans. When every individual takes the responsibility of their actions, it is very much possible to manage environment pollution.
We cannot rule out individuals role in managing environment pollution even if a change is made at government level. If government makes a policy to control environment pollution it is ultimately people who should follow and respect the policy. When government says people should manage their e-waste properly and people don't follow these guidelines then the change brought in by government is not helping manage pollution. How much ever strict the government laws are ultimately it is the responsibility of every individual to control the pollution.
In my opinion, environment pollution can very well be managed by individuals whether or not any change is made at the government level as any change brought in by government has to be ultimately adopted and followed by individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Ammu helen | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | madhutalaari@gmail.com | 65 | view |
- Can money bring happiness? What are the factors for happiness? 55
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model. Do you support it or not? 55
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ut any change at government level. Though environment pollution is too alarming i...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
... environment pollution it is ultimately people who should follow and respect the polic...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...anage their e-waste properly and people dont follow these guidelines then the change...
^^^^
Line 13, column 78, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...can very well be managed by individuals whether or not any change is made at the government le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, well, whereas, as to, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 5.75862068966 556% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43494423792 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07993855063 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434944237918 0.580463131201 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3113459961 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445111570292 0.242375264174 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2216207756 0.0925447433944 239% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152547578773 0.071462118173 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338552877877 0.151781067708 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916107932493 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.