Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Main and local government make a considerable amount of effort to encourage festivals to gain extra profit for country budget. Some people hold the view that authority should excrete investment to poor side of society. While it is important that country should find way to back its budget such as festival, I would rather keen to support the statement in which said to give financial aid in poorer lawyer of society.
On the one hand, it is deniable that government should find several ways to support its budget as competition rate among countries and inner service of country such as providing first medical treatment, maintenance of prison and military services demand big amount of money to be invested. For years, expenditure of country has been increasing which makes the administration of state gain income from any feasible way from starting as taxes to organizing various festivals. In addition, side of gaining benefits are not only government but also its citizens. A lot of people forget about this factor so eventually the many start to think that from festival only authority benefits. For example, when festivals start, a lot of people engage buying decorative ornaments and thing related to holiday which eventually leads seller to gain enough money.
However, the aspect of support to poor families should not be neglected. If some evidence about giving support to poor families is brought from experience of developed countries, it can be noticed that this trend has delivered its benefits to economy and labor quality of country which tested. Many people can achieve to higher position from poor background if the basic support is given. Furthermore, such initiatives towards the poor may decrease disagreement rate between top lawyer of society and low ones. As a result, crime rate which is mainly deprived from lack financial condition may be lessened.
As a conclusion, although it is beneficial to get income for state to keep function for the future, the social benefit of initiative which I mentioned in this essay should be admitted and take some steps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | buitony | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | ayofigo | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | phil999 | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | hieunganngan | 43 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | hieunganngan | 61 | view |
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 77
- Studying abroad can be highly motivational for students and also inspire their dreams. However, whislt studying abroad can have a number of positive effects on students, there are also difficulties that they may meet along the way. With this in mind, it i 84
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun start seems to be countable; consider using: 'many starts'.
Suggestion: many starts
...get about this factor so eventually the many start to think that from festival only author...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14662756598 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68317067848 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565982404692 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4592946425 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.357142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231034397173 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828523681276 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493923523212 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145563337088 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197643968407 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.