The pictures below show the differences in the layout of a conference center between its present and its future plan.
Summarize the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two illustrations given compare the current plan of the layout of conference center with future plan. It can be seen easily that significant changes are planned for the future.
As we look at present, it is obviously that two meeting rooms are there on the west side of the conference center and a huge hall is occurred opposite of the meeting rooms. Additionally, toilets, reception and a cafe are seen towards the south of conference center. A car park and a garden are also existed outside of the conference center and the east side of the map which is present.
Coming the future plan, the two meeting rooms will be replaced with three meeting rooms. Moreover, cafe also is shifted from the south to the north in the left up corner of the hall. A kitchen will be added into the north-east corner of the hall. As we consider the outside of the conference center, it is worth notice that garden will be enlarged and car park will be shrunk.
- Modern medical science has made it possible to combat many diseases. This is one reason that people are living longer lives now than they did in the past. Discuss the effects this might have on society. 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities ampng European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the percentage ofwater used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The pictures below show the differences in the layout of a conference center between its present and its future plan Summarize the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (C02) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... notice that garden will be enlarged and car park will be shrunk.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59649122807 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45501227227 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514619883041 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0177169603 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178887389087 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798962707471 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505477860214 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13546346599 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382306195439 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.