The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While team sport is an effective approach to teach the cooperating skills, it also exposes the students to the risk of injury. I believe there are several safer ways that could help them establish teamwork skillset as sports do.
Team sports teach students fundamental rules to work with others in a strategic and cooperative way. Sports players learned from following sportsmanship style etiquette. They need to understand that he is part of the team and is committed to helping the team win, regardless of his individual goal. Showing respect to each member and valuing their contribution are highly recommended. Besides, disciplining yourself and being reliable, make sure others could always count on you. Imagine that you are on a football team. You won't like to pass the ball to someone who is arrogant or frequently loses the ball.
However, injuries and conflicts are quite common in sports, which makes it less appealing to those who want to practice in a safer environment. For them, plenty of alternatives could be preferable, such as group work in project-oriented classes or community volunteering activities. In the process of writing and carrying out a business plan, for example, students would learn how to allocate tasks according to personal capabilities, balance the goal of the project and the individuals, be flexible, and help each other when unexpected events come out, which is quite common in the real world. With safer and fulfilled teamwork practices, it could not only build cooperation skills but also let them experience the actual business circumstances.
In conclusion, team sports are useful but dangerous. There are other choices that could bring the same, if not better, results for different preferences.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
2024-05-05 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
2023-11-07 | tracywu | 61 | view |
- Most of the world’s problems are caused by overpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Today, more and more people choose to live by themselves. What are the causes of this? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Both scientist and tourist can visit remote natural environments such as the South Pole. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 73
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us all want to do the same and look the same. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aiming at children should be banned because of its negative effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nsistently day in and day out, not just some of the time. Imagine that you are on a footbal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 56, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cooperate'.
Suggestion: to cooperate
...team sport is a useful measure to learn cooperating skills and maintain health, but just fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06312292359 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83370592949 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9249747326 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176779226908 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637886732923 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518681612976 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113473613022 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039104250218 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.