Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It has been a long time since the first movement towards gender equality happening and it still has a long way to go. However, equality in gender does not mean that universities should fill their courses with the same proportion of men and women. In this essay, I will mention the main reasons why I believe that students of any university discipline should be chosen by their merit instead of gender.
First of all, it would be unfair to have an equal number of each gender in every university subject. Currently, all the students who want to enter into the privilege universities have to work very hard to show that they deserve for a place on a course. If the current system changes to admission procedure based on gender, this would demotivate students to excel in their area. Reserving the seat in university courses because of gender would also steal the opportunity to study the subject of their choice of many talented students. Therefore, it would be better to allow both males and females to apply themselves in order to fight for the right to pursue their dream.
Apart from the fair concern expressed above, I believe that it is unrealistic for the university to have the same numbers of men and women in every course. This is because, naturally, some fields are more popular to one gender than another. For example, childcare courses attract a far higher proportion of female applicants than males while the majority of civil engineering students are men. Thus, these courses might be delayed or canceled since the institutions have to wait for enough applications of each gender. I do not think this kind of selection procedure would be effective and beneficial for any side, including the university, students and the economy so there is no reason to do it.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it is impractical and unfair to select university students depended on their gender rather than their talent and qualifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88217522659 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67083498149 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555891238671 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9461665289 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198952104755 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723681583613 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494081373693 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119052085303 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363462228465 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.