Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. How do you think children should spend their free time?
Children have liked playing and entertainments endless. By fulfilling a survey in an elementary school and high school only 8% of them were eager to do their school works rather than spend time for playing. However, why our children prefer free times to school works?
When a child is borne, from the beginning of her/his life non-stop seeking the environment around and learning has happened. Human beings are clever creatures and they are able to do creative works. We should allow our children to uncover their environment and develop their traits and minds. By enforcing them to do some special things such as playing piano, going to dance classes, doing some extra home-works and even going to sport classes we unwillingly limit their special intelligences and suppress them for rest of the lifetime. Therefore, we should let them enjoy their free times in order to help them find their internal characteristics. Furthermore, dedicating free time for offsprings does not mean that we let them to do everything they want. The role of families in providing free times for children is unavoidable.
Parents should participate in some parental classes for managing their children spare times. Although, by having more control on their spare times we can spoil their personality but it is important to educate them draw on their time efficiently. Families should be aware that schools not only don’t have positive effects on our students but also they restrict them in terms of finding their real and right intelligence. Unfortunately, we ourselves are spoiling our students future by sending them to schools. These issue unexpectedly is the result of our researches in a project that lasts for four years.
All in all, it seems that we have make a dramatic mistake in sending our children to schools, maybe the project we have done is only a tip of the iceberg and in near future we will avoid to send them to school insistingly.
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 73
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 67
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 67
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly is the result of our researches in a project that lasts for four years. A...
^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid sending'.
Suggestion: avoid sending
... the iceberg and in near future we will avoid to send them to school insistingly.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01238390093 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72802327963 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554179566563 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6513265796 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337283432557 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126363871891 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869840210013 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213140591005 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113231589359 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.