Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatres, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the authorities should aid in the arts while others are convinced in funding on the public sector. Finding a balance between these paths of donating is a question for government to tackle.
Supporting arts is not a waste of taxpayers` money as some people argue. Entertainment has always been daily for people all over the world. Working five days a week, having a side responsibilities, caring about people all these factors can be underestimated. Visiting theatres or museums, a jazz concert could be a sip of fresh air from daily routine. If the authorities had not aided some funds in the arts, the planet would not have ever known about Michael Jackson. This is why people should understand at the government because one of their duty is to provide some sort of pleasure to us.
Public services have always been requiring aid from the government. Despite any attempts there is a group of people who do not care about being entertained because they spend their lives in shelters. The government has always been attempting to support this sector but the reality is often disappointing. If the government had funded in shelters at Skid Row, these attempts would not have minimized the number of homeless people. Because of those who do not desire to change anything even with aid from the authorities. In other words, donations should be calculated and not be overestimated in terms of priority choice.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the best solution is to find and keep the balance of assistance for social aspects under the government`s control.
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages Support your answer with s 61
- Some people think that technology has made our life too complex However other people think that it has made our life easier Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that technology has made our life too complex However other people think that it has made our life easier Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do you think that there is too much emphasis on bad news these days 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'responsibility'?
Suggestion: responsibility
...Working five days a week, having a side responsibilities, caring about people all these factors ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...inimized the number of homeless people. Because of those who do not desire to change an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in conclusion, sort of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93022866619 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8189891459 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132008194528 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464468955688 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407256987956 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079138374171 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168697761934 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.