When children start school, teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Educational instructors are of great significance in terms of fostering children’s intellect and individual characteristics. However, parents also affect young kids in a various of ways and are no less important and there should be combination of these two parties to facilitates children's advancement in all aspects. Therefore, I strongly disagree with this statement and shall provide evidence to support my opinion.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that children under the care of teachers would effectively develop their intellectual ability. Because teachers are professionally trained in terms of psychology and pedagogy, they are expected to deliver academic lessons comprehensively so children and acquire knowledge about their surroundings easily. In addition, school educators can also teach their students moral values, which are essential for a child’s social development. For example, children can learn from their instructors how to behave well in the family or how to befriend with their peers through lessons given in class activities, songs and fun stories.
On the other hand, parents also play pivotal role in influencing a child’s common knowledge and behaviours. For instance, children of musicians are likely to obtain knowledge related to music and instruments from their parents at an early age, which later encourage them to become a talented artist. Moreover, it is the parents’ behaviours that have important impacts on how a child interact with the society when they grow up. Psychological research indicates that young students suffering from parental abuse at home would in turn become more aggressive and violent when they are at school, which expressed the child’s abnormal emotional and social advancement due to mistreating. In contrast, children grown up with well-behaved adults, they would most likely to become a kind-hearted and productive citizens in the future.
To summarise, I strongly believe both parties have great influence on children’s intellectual and social development; therefore, neither outweighs one another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-25 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | sandhuraim | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-16 | lileetran92 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-23 | thaovuphuong19 | 89 | view |
- 5 There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays museums have become more and more important What are the purposes of places such as museums and how should they be funded 69
- Human activity has had negative impacts on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The table below gives figures for student applications and acceptances for UK university course in the field of tourism transport and travel Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 79
- 8 The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...e no less important and there should be combination of these two parties to facilitates chi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72025723473 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12658929717 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604501607717 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8097014465 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.846153846 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276155391857 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090878152778 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506176018296 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151907740835 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607968831508 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...e no less important and there should be combination of these two parties to facilitates chi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72025723473 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12658929717 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604501607717 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8097014465 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.846153846 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276155391857 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090878152778 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506176018296 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151907740835 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607968831508 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.