Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In recent years, household waste recycling is a moot issue and a lot of arguments could be observed among people regarding whether people should spontaneously take part in recycling process or government should make it a legal obligation. While I agree that new legislation to force people to recycle could help this situation, I believe that setting a law is not only measure that government should take.
On the one hand, a new legal provision would be one possible way to tackle the waste problem. This law might be added to the rights and obligations of a citizen in the country to encourage and prevent misbehavior of recycling. For example, government could establish a law for householder to separate all garbage into different bins and people who fail to adhere to this law could be punish small fine to community service. In addition, while we have strict laws and punishments for behaviors that lead to environment pollution such as deforestation, governments should have clear rules for recycling that is a convenient and easy protecting environment process.
On the other hand, I believe that governments should do more than introduce a law. Knowledge of recycling can be put into education as an after-school subject for students. For example, children who learn about recycling and the environmental impact of household waste have higher conceive than other. Beside of that, the government should encourage services and advertisements that support the utilization of regenerative materials and accommodate customers with renewable productions.
In conclusion, the legal obligations are necessary to encourage household waste recycling. While laws are enforcement, other factors such as education, advertisement and services should be encourage to people to dispose of their waste more responsibly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 61
- The pie chart below shows the frequency of U S Adults online purchasing habits in 2015 while the bar chart shows a further classification denoting online purchasing preferences Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 69
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The Bar graph below shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in the UK 73
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
...n, advertisement and services should be encourage to people to dispose of their waste mor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...sement and services should be encourage to people to dispose of their waste more responsi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42049469965 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.128272363 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544169611307 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.112729556 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303114887733 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1117911155 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624874437361 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194546348856 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518791281758 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.