Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking
pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Even though a majority of populace believes that paparazzi or a freelance photographer who pursues celebrities to get photographs of them aids in climbing the ladder of fame, still a minority renders concern for the privacy of renowned personalities as they visualize it as a fallacious practice. undoubtedly, by ill luck this exerts petty hassles in the life of famous celebrities but I adamantly cogitate that primarily it endows immense benefits to celebs by proliferating their popularity and gratifying their own self.
Truly, the insane following by the freelancers in order capture the descriptive and acute moments of the life of superstars put them in dilemma which impede them from getting rid of their reel life. Gradually, the famous people tend to develop phobia about being advertised in each and every condition and are deprived from entitled social and personal contentment. Thus, they always prefer to shun them and sometimes encounter such situations which prove perilous for them. Sadly, the high-profile accident which caused death of Princess Diana was an unintentional act of avoiding paparazzi in an event. Henceforth, the actions of random clickers always put the life of stars in risk which eventually gives birth to fatal repercussions.
On the brighter side, paparazzi is the significant and fundamental methodology to intensify the stardom of stars by publicizing the personality and behavior of celebs among commoners. Interestingly, the freelancer documents the life of great personalities and entrepreneurs through photos and exhibit or telecast the reports about their philanthropic deeds. A worthy illustration of this could be the report highlighted by New York Times in the gone calendar year stating that the journals which are published by paparazzi have direct nexus with escalation in the TRP of famous celebrities in U.S.A. Therefore, the hidden assets associated with this act of self employed photography cannot be overlooked.
To conclude, although paparazzi imposes few threats to the celebrities still it provides mountainous advantage to them by improving their image in the community which is the sole need for stardom. Undeniably, I reckon that reporters put myriads of positive effects on the career of famous person by depicting their images in the society.
- After being involved in an accident you were looked after by a person you did not know before Write a special thank you letter to express your gratitude In your letter Introduce yourself and let him her know why you are writing Express your appreciation A 89
- people spent alot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before is it a positive or negative development 89
- people spent alot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before is it a positive or negative development 89
- people spent alot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before is it a positive or negative development 89
- you would like to participate in a work related seminar in another country Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates program accommodation and cost You do NOT need to write any address 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undoubtedly
... visualize it as a fallacious practice. undoubtedly, by ill luck this exerts petty hassles ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...his exerts petty hassles in the life of famous celebrities but I adamantly cogitate that primarily...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...ect nexus with escalation in the TRP of famous celebrities in U.S.A. Therefore, the hidden assets ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... depicting their images in the society.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45961002786 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07269739193 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607242339833 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1918377153 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.333333333 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9166666667 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160489573995 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539202493846 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030289702926 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956139510169 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240595970232 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.