Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Time plays an essential role in our life. Either you run the day or day runs you. Although some people would harbor that a job with five working days for shorter hours is better, I believe that we should have a position where we can work only three days a week for long hours. I had a firm belief that we should have work with fewer working days in a week but long hours for several reasons, and would develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

First and foremost, we can spend remaining time either with our family or can complete our tasks such as banking transactions, a payment of internet bills, visiting children's schools, etc. As a result, we can create a balance between work and personal life. I must say that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by own experience. I joined a small automobile company after I attended my bachelor in Mechanical and Automation Engineer. In this organization, I used to work five days with 8 hours. However, considering the traveling time and overtime, I spent almost 11-12 hours in the office. Afterward, around five years later, I joined a German multinational company, where I devoted 11 hours a day but only needed to go three days a week. Due to this change in working days, I could plan my remaining days for personal tasks. We can see from this example that with fewer working days in a week, we can balance work and personal life.

Secondly, an individual can pursue a part-time job. With increased personal demands, it is arduous to manage a family with a limited amount of money. Accordingly, an individual can look for a part-time job, such as working as a waiter in a hotel, a real estate agent, a part-time teacher, etc. These referred jobs enable a person to provide a comfortable life for his family. Drawing from my brother's experience, he is working for a financing firm that opens only for three days a week to support their customers. Whereas balance days, employees can opt for other job options. Hence, my brother is working as a real estate agent, along with the job above in the financing firm. For this reason, fewer working days enable a person to earn additional income.

In conclusion, I would firmly support a job with fewer working days a week for long hours. This is because we can balance our work and personal life and earn additional income.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-11 maryka72 60 view
2023-03-07 Hibahtabbaa 70 view
2023-02-27 kevin1105 66 view
2023-02-26 Hibahtabbaa 60 view
2023-02-23 can111 3 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user batravision27 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idering the traveling time and overtime, I spent almost 11-12 hours in the offic...
^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring the traveling time and overtime, I spent almost 11-12 hours in the office. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6690821256 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60405406534 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475845410628 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1919267118 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0434782609 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411569405463 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127276853889 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111537991703 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291677103012 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107121947765 0.0645574589148 166% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.