Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The prompt suggests that the government should withold funding for arts in times of high unemployment or famine. In my not so humble opinion, I mostly agree with the statement that such financial aid should be redirected towards more essential systems for the following two reasons.
To begin, one might argue that insufficient funding of creative industry may have detrimental impact on the society. But in the case where millions of people are jobless, the least thing they would worry about is the well being of museums and art galleries. How art is supposed to remedy the national economic crisis or humanitarian calamity like famine? In my opinion, it’s obvious that all free money should be invested in more important sectors of the economy like healthcare, agriculture, infrastructure, and private sector. These sectors are primary contributors to the resurgence of national economy and they also sustain overall well being of the society.
Further, during the adverse times of financial or humanitarian crisis, government should focus solely on the solution of the ongoing crisis. The arts and creative industry are somewhat peripheral in that hard times. The reasonable question arouses: Can the paintings, collages, sculptures feed people or they can employ them? It’s more probable than not that such imprudent espousal of arts, when the whole country is facing adversity, would pose a question among citizens on the competency of the ruling authority. Hence, it will disturb the society and can potentially lead to the escalation of situation. Imagine yourself that your country is undergoing a severe humanitarian crisis like enormous floods or recent typhoon that obliterated half of the counrty. And your government instead of full-supporting survivors and the refugees starts compensating the material loses of the art industry, would you question the actions of the governing body? I think the answer is clear.
On the contrary, the arts have some intrinsic value which makes them indispensable. As they are primary keepers of humane history, and all this painting are vestiges that we should preserve. Escpecially in times of great hardships, it’s that time when they’re most vulnerable. For example, during the World War II historians have estimated that the total of 5000 pieces of invaluable painting, sculptures and collages were lost. It happened simple because nobody cared about or had the time to preserve them. However, it’s only now became obvious the consequence of such negligence of the spiritual wealth of humanity.
In conlusion, based on the above arguments governments should primarily focus on the well-being of their citizens during the any crisis. Nevertheless, the total dismissal of the creative industry would have deleterious impact, even if it’s not imminent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-05 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-27 | mei_unavailable | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | mako_mew@hotmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 83
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the mos 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 83
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ages, sculptures feed people or they can employ them? It’s more probable than not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, i think, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2388.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41496598639 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84332583921 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8589616896 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.826086957 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1739130435 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86956521739 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182045158154 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426416305086 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458275431989 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095202413257 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041820408468 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.