Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f

Essay topics:

Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Some people argue that countries should not provide funding for art fields when there exists a domestic situation of high unemployment rate and large-scale starvation. And to some extent, I do agree with this propose.

It’s widely acknowledged that art is a spiritual food for the mankind, and it makes sense to take the advantage of art to feed the citizens’ heart when the domestic situation is not promising. The power of art can indeed ameliorate the negative feeling triggered by the food and economy shortage, by inspiring the people and providing them with the picture of the bright future. In earlier days, some African countries are enduring such situation, and their people did not lose hope, and this might be attributed to the art. African people usually live as a clan, and they have a deep belief in their totems, they invented their unique dance movements and they made songs and rhythms for celebrations. these are art, and art will amplify the happiness and sooth the pain. Hunter came back with food just enough for stay alive, but the African people still use the art to celebrate, and live on.

But is it that urgent for art to be funded in such scenario? I do not think so. Because art, unlike physical stuff requiring labor or money effort to obtain, is a product of spiritual creation, which do not take money as compulsory. Instead, art are greatly boosted in hard situation. During the Anti-Japanese war, the warriors are under the threat of intruders and starvation, and it is that moment, they composed many inspiring songs, and China’s national song, is also created under such scenario. Albeit history is history and we have a much civilized world, there is still some rules we can follow. When people are most unemployed and hungry, the first thing is to keep the people alive by providing food and health care, which is the top priority of government fundings. And whether to fund art or not depends on the remaining amount of government resources. Moreover, the arrangement of the art fund should be decided under great considerations, that is funding the type of art that is most close to the people, rather than those hard-to-understand things.

To sum up, I much agree the suspending art fund argument, not in a way that give zero attention to the art, but in a second-step way after what the government can do has been done, then we can have a detailed consultation on the art fundings.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-05 jenas 50 view
2023-12-27 mei_unavailable 62 view
2023-09-26 Isolus 66 view
2023-03-31 mako_mew@hotmail.com 50 view
2022-08-31 bhavna288 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mei_unavailable :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...zens’ heart when the domestic situation is not promising. The power of art can indeed ameliorate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ade songs and rhythms for celebrations. these are art, and art will amplify the happi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81861575179 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68537891255 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520286396181 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 13.0 1.77640449438 732% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3269043036 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223126717064 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708791048493 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409016900981 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141756605692 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025547090461 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.