The graph belows shows that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012
The provided line chart compares the proportion of international trade from Australia to 4 different nations, including Japan, the US, China, and India, between 1990 and 2012.
Overall, the initial impression from the graph is that out of the four-nation surveyed, China gradually became the major foreign market with its figures, being the only one undergoing a steady upward trend, while most other countries saw a steep drop in the percentage of exports from Australia. Over the given period, the rate of Australian exports to China rose dramatically from around 2 percent in 1990 until it reached the highest value at nearly 29 percent in 2012. In Japan, although the figure stood at approximately 26 percent, which is the top position in 1990, it has shown a gradual reduction and dropped to the lowest point at 18 percent in 2012.
From 1990 to 2000, there were several considerable changes in international trade performances to the two following nations. After many significant fluctuations, the percentage of Australian exports to the US quickly decrease by about 5 percent at its bottom position in 2010, then went up moderately to 6 percent in 2010. The data of India stagnated at the starting figures in over the 10 years course. After 2000, the rate rose sharply to the top at 7 percent, then finished after a drop-down at roughly 5 percent, lower than the final figure of the US in 2012.
- The chart below shows the percentage of the city s population that does not have any sort of health insurance There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities
- The graph below shows that the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2000 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the city s population that does not have any sort of health insurance There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities 57
- This chart below shows the percentage of the city s population that does not have any sort of health insurance There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities
- Below is a chart showing how many hours per week an average person spent on various kinds of media including watching television surfing on the Internet listening to the radio and reading printed material The years covered are from 1990 to 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94092827004 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78933911225 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9892231367 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.375 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244320164354 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101479085612 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653533166061 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166281024791 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684447137365 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.