Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in
touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
Smartphones have become for adults indispensable devices that most of us can not imagine our life without. While such devices are safe for adults, it could be problematic for children. some parents prefer to allow their children to own them but others prefer to forbid it. reasons to forbid are well know, mostly because is too distracting for them and second radio signals could be dangerous for young children. personally I think we should allow children to own personal smartphones because, one reason is children safety and second it has become a standard way of communication even between children of the same age.
Children safety is probably the main concern and stress reason for a parent. From an early age a parent will invest a lot of money and energy in it. Smartphones offers a possibility to stay always connected with your child and for this reason parent will feel safer when he knows where his child is. Although that might be a false impression it is still better than not knowing anything. I don't have a personal experience where smartphones was critical for safety, but I have read articles where children called police in a critical moment, thus children avoided an injury. I have two seven months daughters that are too small to own a smart phone but I definitely feel the need to protect them.
Secondly apart from being useful, smartphones are fun, that is why most children are addicted to them. I saw many children that spend too much time on such devices and that is probably a concern for a parent. Doctors recommend to limit our time spend on smartphones especially, but completely forbidding such a device doesn't mean children will suddenly read more books or spend more time with their parents.
In my experience when I visited friends with young children, child spend time on his phone when he felt ignored. I always asked them about their books or plays and he would immediately forget about phone and spend time with me.
In conclusion I think we should not forbid young children smartphones because such devices could help in a state of stress and second smartphones are becoming mainstream that as a parent we can stop it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | Jasman23 | 40 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | memi00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | anaju.candida | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | anaju.candida | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | kk_kk | 66 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 73
- Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school which way can bring them the most benefit 1 to accumulate work experience by a part time job or volunteering in a community 2 learning to play a sport 3 learning to play a musical instr 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
..., it could be problematic for children. some parents prefer to allow their children ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons to forbid are well know, mostly because is too distracting for them and ...
^^
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
... could be dangerous for young children. personally I think we should allow children to own...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...safer when he knows where his child is. Although that might be a false impression it is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ill better than not knowing anything. I dont have a personal experience where smartp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend limiting'.
Suggestion: recommend limiting
...robably a concern for a parent. Doctors recommend to limit our time spend on smartphones especiall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...but completely forbidding such a device doesnt mean children will suddenly read more b...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sked them about their books or plays and he would immediately forget about phone ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, apart from, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81451612903 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55638659845 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502688172043 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.944256131 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.352941176 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248810007277 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878395574056 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365555597704 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141691578663 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401905711444 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.