As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely decrease.
The developments in technologies have increased the capabilities of a normal human being. Technology has enabled us to achieve things that people would have dreamt of many years back. If we take a close look at the daily routine of an individual, we can clearly observe that humans have become completely dependent on technology for accomplishing various tasks during the day. Technology has provided us an efficient way of life, saving our time by making human involvement and effort redundant. Some may think that technology promotes the problem solving abilities as humans are the ones who develop such technologies, however, I am of a different thought that technology is in fact deteriorating the thinking skills of humans.
To see the effect technology is having on our brains, we need to look at the children of the current generation. These children have grown up interacting with modern technology. Children from the beginning of their formative years are using technologies like the internet to find solutions to mathematical problems or for writing essays etc. The ease of availability of such resources is discouraging children to come up with solutions. This is killing the imaginative and creative thinking capabilities in the upcoming generations. Consequently, it would curb the development of higher order thinking and cognitive skills in these children. Solving problems through technology in future would require an even higher intellect than the current scenario due to the increased complexities of issues to be solved.
In addition to that, technology has not reached a point till now that it may be termed as completely reliable. Researchers and scientists may have developed autonomous technologies like self-driving automobiles or airplanes, however, they still need human supervision to operate. For example, in the scenario of an autonomous vehicle, if the technology operating the vehicle fails then it is upto the abilities and skills of the humans to take control of the situation and save the lives of the passengers that might be inside the vehicle. If we completely ignore imparting such skills to people and leave it to technology to do the thinking then the dangers might increase.
Some may still believe that technology enhances human intellect as it promotes an efficient lifestyle, however, they forget taking into account that the people they talk about grew up when technological advancements were not so mainstream. To get a real picture they must closely look at the cognitive skills of the current generation that is growing up and imparting a huge portion of their time to technology.
- Every individual in a society has the responsibility to obey laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws 62
- Collectors prize the ancient life size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision Since archeologists have recently discovered molds of human heads 60
- In survey s Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favourite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of 53
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely decrease 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 506, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...olvement and effort redundant. Some may think that technology promotes the problem so...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29832935561 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06123856088 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515513126492 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6292011869 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214790262486 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692931982237 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521578016166 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13597463076 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057965828486 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.