Television does not give people an accurate view of human nature.
During the 21th century, TV still is one of the most important way to access information. Although, the TV’s channels do not give a correct approach of human nature. Nowadays, we realize that we watch on TV what they want to show us. All that we see today have the TV professionals’ point of view. Additionally, human’s natural diversity and sponsors’ guidelines are most important than true news.
First, as a natural condition we have people’s influence at all TV programs. Because they have the shows’ guidelines, they can send us the information which is better for them. When we figure out about what they are saying, it is clear that all news have their point of view.
Second, we live in a huge planet with all population diversity. Sometimes we just have a small example about human’s natural complexity. Consequently, when we realize, we have all information just from a ridiculous percentage of people’s behavior.
Third, it is very normal that television have what sponsors want on their program’s schedule. As a result of money’s importance in modern society, all media have to follow their sponsors’ rules. However, we still have some good options that do not show us just their perceptions.
To conclude, our modern world mantain the television as an important source of information. Unfortunately, we have some minor problems that we have to live with. Due to professionals’ influence, people natural diversity, and sponsors’ believes, TV programs cannot give us an accurate view of human nature.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 60
- For students who are planning to work in business learning about psychology is more important than learning about technology 70
- the sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast rapidly declining 90
- Advertisements for children should not be allowed 76
- If you could meet a famous entertainer or athlete who would that be and why If you could ask a famous person one question what would you ask Why 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
During the 21th century, TV still is one...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...st important way to access information. Although, the TV’s channels do not give a correc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes are most important than true news. First, as a natural condition we have pe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat all news have their point of view. Second, we live in a huge planet with al...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulous percentage of people’s behavior. Third, it is very normal that television...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...do not show us just their perceptions. To conclude, our modern world mantain th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, second, so, still, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 250.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.168 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06814341255 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.621317958 48.9658058833 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189248560506 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698891518084 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094888165447 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123553429007 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105293042239 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.