Universities should allocate the same amount of money to students’ sports activities as they allocate to their libraries. Do you agree?
Universities have a great potential to uncover sporting talent. It is argued that universities should allocate equal budgets for the sports and the library department, however, I disagree, and In my opinion sports should be allocated a larger budget than libraries.
Expensive sporting equipments are one of the reasons why equal budget allocations for these two departments will be unjust. Even the basic models of sporting kits, for instance a cricket kit, costs a fortune. Therefore it will not be reasonable to expect high standards in the sports department of an institution if it is not spending enough on the sporting facilities. In contrast to the library, where spendings and maintenance costs are fairly low due to comparitively cheaper prices of books and journals, sports vertical of a university spend hefty amounts on buying upto date kits and maintaining playgrounds. As a result, even for comparable standards in both the departments, sports segment would require larger funding.
Another reason why I support extra funds for sports activities is that it could help in increased participation from students in sports which is a positive development. Involvement in sports is imperative as it gives a break from the stress caused by ever-increasing competition in each stage of life starting from adolscence to the old age. With extra funds, institutions would be able to promote and advert sports among the students, and as a result, student participation in sporting engagements will increase.
To conclude, although both library and the sports are two important organizations of a university, I opine that the later should be allocated a larger amount of money due to the costs incurred and the important role it has to play in promoting sports engagements.
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Write a letter to a city planning manager about the demolition of a historical building in your area.In your letter, you should:· explain why it shouldn’t be demolished.· suggest a future use for this building.· recommend a way to raise money for rep 84
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar when compared to the past What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 88
- Some people spent a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this is a good or bad thing? 73
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after. Otherpeople disagree, however, saying that this depends on a child’s circumstances. Consider these opposingviews, and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nstance a cricket kit, costs a fortune. Therefore it will not be reasonable to expect hig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...sonable to expect high standards in the sports department of an institution if it is n...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lay in promoting sports engagements.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33450704225 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11190123235 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3155171815 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.727272727 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267315472214 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103122014178 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075564451422 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184737051996 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712651225203 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.