Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In society today, traffic accidents are one of the most concerned issues. It is argued that the proper method to ensure safety when joining traffic is to raise the minimum driving years old. In my perspective, I disagree in part with this view because I think that there are still equally important other solutions and should be taken into account as well.
To begin with, I agree that increasing the minimum age to participate in driver exams to take licenses can be an effective measure. Firstly, that allow adolescents having more time to sharpen their driving skills. They can attend to basic or advanced driving courses from that, they will feel more confident to able to solve every possible situation on roads. Furthermore, due to the low awareness of children about transportation safety when entering into traffic. They do not obey traffic laws and regulations such as pass red lights, do not observe, cross unexpected streets, so on. For example, according to the statistic of traffic accidents in VietNam, casualties in communications by means of motorcycles or cars accounted for 20% of which the majority were not wearing a helmet. Therefore, when the driving age is increased, young people will be more mature and strictly abide by travel.
On the other hand, I think that better road safety can be achieved by other more effective ways. First of all, more stringent traffic regulations should be imposed, which would act as a deterrent to would-be traffic lawbreakers. In Singapore, people who run red lights are fined heavily, and hence this will make them more responsible in order to avoid future punishments. In addition, governments should also allocate financial resources to improving public transport, which would encourage citizens to use their private vehicles less. As a result, that would help reduce the area's traffic density as well as the number of vehicles crash.
In conclusion, with the arguments aforementioned above, I totally believe that besides the growing driving age, other methods should be applied at the same time to gain the best effect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | emzin | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 73
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 2008 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, so, still, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13196480938 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72374507767 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618768328446 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0293961374 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0625 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167892570038 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500000691733 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372909849 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941266151441 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396238570886 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.