Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Technology has revolutionized the way of communicating with each other to such an extent that people can instantly find out what their families or friends are doing at a moment even if they are scattered around the world. This essay will discuss the impact of technology upon people's relationships and explain how it has become a drawback in lives.
People have become used to making relationships and keeping in touch with them through social media. In contrast to the past, we have more friends nowadays, with whom we communicate regularly, even though all of them are through digital applications. A research done by Toronto IT university discovered that average person with a Facebook account has 100 close friends. While there are lots of connections in the digital world, it has become impossible for a group of friends to gather to a physical location such as a ground and play a game, mainly due to the busy lifestyles.
Even though individuals today have more connections, I would argue technology has deteriorate the quality of relationships they have. Firstly, public are not aware of the person living next door, and this has led them to become helpless in an emergency. Because of the fact that most try to impress others with their online presence, their friends wouldn't know if someone is going through a hard time and wouldn't be able to assist. Secondly, violation of privacy has become a greater concern. It is easier for scammers to impersonate as someone closer to an individual and deceive them. This may result not only in theft but also in blackmailing.
In conclusion, it is true that technology has changed how people connect with each other. Nevertheless, I think it is not a healthy development since it has become more of a problem due to not being able to get help in physical world as well as attackers.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 84
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problem In order to reduce the problem should we discourage people to use car 89
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 65
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'deteriorated'.
Suggestion: deteriorated
...nnections, I would argue technology has deteriorate the quality of relationships they have....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: Because
...hem to become helpless in an emergency. Because of the fact that most try to impress others with their o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...th their online presence, their friends wouldnt know if someone is going through a hard...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...omeone is going through a hard time and wouldnt be able to assist. Secondly, violation ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, in contrast to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89137380192 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82652824316 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568690095847 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9470371071 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241575935355 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797436973087 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931855020985 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160718614158 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864391288109 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.