The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree

Some people believe that persuading people is suburban areas and countryside to settle in the cities is the most viable option for solving city traffic and transportation problems. This essay completely disagrees with the above statement. Firstly, this proposal will affect negatively on the present state due to the increased vehicle usage and secondly, living in the cities is more expensive.
Urbanization is the prime reason for increased traffic congestion in the major cities and encouraging more people to move in will not be a solution but a disaster. Residents will require more vehicles to complete their daily tasks and responsibilities since most of the people fancy personal automobiles. Moreover, people from different age groups seeking to travel together will also add more to the congestion. For example, New York suffering from hours of traffic jams due to excessive population. Even though there are good public transportation services, 60 percent of New Yorkers use personal vehicles which have made the governors consider banning cars.
Cost of living in a city is expensive but convenient, whereas it is cheaper in the countryside. Because of the high demand for accommodations, rentals are almost double in urban areas. In addition to that, all the utilities cost more, and taxes are higher. Country people might not be able to afford the additional costs added up with their moving charges. Facing the new environment with less financial stability will deteriorate their quality of life even if this solution addresses the traffic problem.
In conclusion, encouraging the public to live in the cities would not help in addressing traffic and transportation woes since more people utilize more vehicles and the fact that cities not being affordable to everyone.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (7 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3475177305 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8985668969 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9959181822 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270410979403 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882527414154 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878630650178 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184065609891 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751220955096 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.