Nowadays it is not ond produce films. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, thanks to the advance in digital technologies and filming appliances, making films is no longer a monopoly sector of large enterprises. Instead, films made by individuals using their own devices have enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years. From my perspective, this tendency is true positive due to various reasons
To begin with, there is a variety of explanations for why individual filmmaking is beneficial. First and foremost, it raises the movie industry to a whole new level of cinematographies as well as contents. Whilst films made by massive companies often emphasize the commercial aspect, which restricted them to a handful of themes, genres and backgrounds, that of amateur film-makers addressed plenty of interesting topics as money is not their prerequisite. Another benefit of this trend that is worth considering is due to the fact that it provides the potential filmmaker with better opportunities to become well-known among the population. It seems to be shreds of evidence that easy access to film technology help discovers several hidden talents. By uploading self-made movies to the video-sharing platforms, several unknown filmmakers have attained resounding success after a really short period.
Despite certain arguments that the booming of films can result in difficulty in censoring, I believed there is nothing to worry about since we have numerous departments specialized in film censorship. Furthermore, all video-sharing platform have their policies to protect viewers from inappropriate film contents. By the way of illustration, movies contain violent or sexual scenery, as well as some particular matters of controversy, will be considered as age-restricted works. There is also extra opposing view that films are made with lower cost are scarcely excellent ones. It may partly true, then again, but it cannot be denied that among several elements that make a good film, the expertise and capabilities of the producer still play a key role in its quality. Besides, it is irrefutable that numerous movies are still well-received by the public regardless of the short budget
To sum up, the developing of filmmaking technology that allows anyone to produce films is truly a positive trend since it does not only diversify the movie themes but also provide amateurs filmmakers with a better opportunity to become well-known by the public
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 95
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 89
- People often think about creating an ideal society but most of the times fail in making this happen What is your opinion about an ideal society How can we create an ideal society 84
- Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that girls and boys benefit more from attending mixed schools Which education system do you think is better Why 73
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, really, so, still, then, well, as well as, by the way, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45822102426 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1056874671 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614555256065 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0572334881 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.642857143 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136761229276 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443081240419 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032930585724 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946383406432 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313687462193 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.