Today more and more tourist are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the sahara desert or the antarctic.
Nowadays, people prefer traveling to many detinations that the stipulations are thorny. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then I will give my own perspective.
On one side of the argument, there several merits when citizens going to visit some risky places. First of all, they want to discover new lands and find out something new fangled which could make they felt over the moon. Besides, people also can experiece new challenge of wide nature. With the flentiful features, it cause of increasing a keen interest of traveller. For instance, the Sahara desert is the largest and hottest desert in the world. Visiting such sites and knowing about specialties like the climate, flora and fauna, and geographical conditions which made those places distinct from others would be an invaluable experience.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact excursionist could confront with the risk. Firstly, because of harsh weather conditions, it might cause an obstruction to somebody who want to have great trip. Even so ,they can face to face with predators, people may be lose one’s life, I means that prepare to meet thy god. Another reason is lack of services, facilities, foods and drinks which can keep alive for them when they are joining into somewhere with low fitness.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that humans are really selfish and want to discover everything and use them in bad ways, while the earth and Environment is not just for them, next generation and even other creature have to use them too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | ielts_tony | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-13 | padmaJ | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | Niharika rani | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | pourya | 84 | view |
- You eat at your college cafeteria at lunch time every day However you think it needs some improvements Write a letter to the college magazine In your letter 1 Explain what you like about the cafeteria 2 Say what is wrong with it 3 Suggest how it could be 87
- Children doing froup work vs working on their own 56
- a letter to a singer 11
- 25 10 2017 You have been to a business meeting at another company and saw a piece of equipment which can be useful for your company too Write a letter to your manager about the following Describe the piece of equipment you have seen Why having the same eq 81
- Children doing froup work vs working on their own 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...nature. With the flentiful features, it cause of increasing a keen interest of travel...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ody who want to have great trip. Even so ,thay can face to face with predators, p...
^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o ,thay can face to face with predators, people may be lose one’s life, I means t...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...tors, people may be lose one’s life, I means that prepare to meet thy god. Another r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, even so, for instance, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65536700607 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674074074074 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.013108963 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282865114666 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779915094948 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165640614621 0.0667982634062 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13032272178 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176533668153 0.056905535591 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.