In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Inquiry has become an important part of a process be it a manufacturing company, a service provider or an investigation centre. Inquiry not only gives an opprtunity to get new ideas that were previously unknown, but also provides information about the wrong side of business. The prompt discusses that in this process of inquiry neophytes are more likely to succeed than skilled people. However, I mostly diagree with the prompt in two ways. Nevertheless, I concede a few scenarios where beginners might gather more information.
First of all, inquiry is an art of getting information from people by making them happy or even sad. For example, in an interrogation an expert interrogater can mesmerize the felon by his words. He can have the ability to point the soft and hard part of the criminal and acquire required statement. A consummate person can ask a seemly simple question and gain crucial fact. Whereas, beginners does not have such ability. An obdurate person can easily take over a fledgling interrogater. In these conditions an expert is likely to make more contributions.
Secondly, inquiry is done by service providers to get the valuable feedbacks from their customers. A post service follow up can make them savvy of their wrongdoings as well as focus on the areas which make consumers happy. During this process, an experienced costumer care official can ask the right questions related to their services and gather the customers views as well as convince them in case of any dissatisfaction. But an unexperienced official is likely to ask pompous and tedious questions that are fringe and further agitates unsatisfied people more. In this case shrewdness plays an inportant role in keeping the target happy as well as persuade unhappy people to visit them again.
Despite all reqired qualitites in an inquirer, sometimes due to utter arrogance as well as frivolous behaviour of the expert, due to over-confidence can produce bad outcomes. In these case, a beginner is well informed of his limits and does the task with great care in given stringent directions that gives desired results.
Thus, in conclusion, a skilled person can make a huge contribution in inquiry, if he is not flamboyance; can determine the right conditions as well as questions that makes his task successful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 45
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...riminal and acquire required statement. A consummate person can ask a seemly simple question...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... simple question and gain crucial fact. Whereas, beginners does not have such ability. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed official is likely to ask pompous and tedious questions that are fringe and fu...
^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ppy people to visit them again. Despite all reqired qualitites in an inquirer, s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10317460317 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96486262799 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568783068783 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8829511578 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.45 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131297360996 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444181911739 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362999036534 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722910323728 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272708512866 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.