Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In modern era, there have been lots of diverse charity foundations especially in developed countries. During their active years, the destination for their voluntary efforts, has been one of the controversial discussions among people. Some individuals argue that only countries which should be helped is their own ones. While, others claim that they have to provide human’s needs anywhere in the world. I myself believe charities should help all the people no matter where they are.
To commence with, allocating all the voluntary approaches for the society which it has been established in, has had considerable reasons. Creating some organizations such as charity ones have required not only a great deal of money, but also sympathetic work forces. These facilities should be prepared in the society which charity has been founded. Therefore, all the funding should be arranged by the authorities. For example, it would be too unjustified to utilize all the finance and working people of charities in such countries like Germany in other countries which has not paid for neither of them.
On the other hand, the main principle of charitable foundations has been their valuable measures without any expectations. Charity has been built to support people who have needed some help In order to alter their lives’ conditions. In fact, if they did not help particularly citizens of poor countries, they would not carry out their major job. Several charities, for instance, have been established in America which have helped many African people during their performance besides their own residents.
In conclusion, although it may call as unfair action to help other people across the world by charities, I concur with supporting all the individuals. As it was mentioned, the primary charity job has been to help poor individuals around the world no matter where they are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-12 | tejashulawale | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-15 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | drmona.914 | 89 | view |
- When cars and cyclists use the same roads there are often problems Why is this case What are the solutions 73
- Ensuring that children have regular physical exercise should be the responsibility of parents and therefore schools should not waste valuable school time having sports lessons as part of the curriculum To what extend do you agree 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ich should be helped is their own ones. While, others claim that they have to provide...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27666666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76473627434 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0901440282 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32501696558 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117225903979 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106215940212 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20757046401 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672130657606 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.