In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is becoming more popular, but some people are against these measures.
Do the benefits of CCTV outweigh its drawbacks?
These days, it seems that more and more CCTV systems are installing in public places in many cities than ever before. Personally, I believe that there are both social and safety factors that account for this change, and I would argue that this change has much more beneficial impacts than adverse impacts.
On the one hand, the opting of using video cameras to monitor public areas might be disapproved by many people for some reason. First, the proliferation of CCTV cameras invades privacy, in the sense that people are constantly watched and every different movement of each person is recorded instantly by authorities. Therefore, they find this instructive and feel that their individual freedoms are controlled and curtailed by states’ governments. Another issue is that video surveillances require considerable financial costs for investment and maintenance that governments have to pay to provide in lieu of spending the expenditures on educational purposes and infrastructural facilities.
On the other hand, I suppose that the advantages of video surveillance overshadowed its disadvantages by positive influences. The key objective of using video cameras in public places is to deter criminals and to prevent crime. Specifically, a research that studied the rates of the offenders in public areas indicated that since the CCTV cameras have been installed, there is a significant decrease in the number of crimes happened in the streets. At the same time, when crimes are committed, polices can easily track down evidences by using video records in order to catch and prosecute offenders. Therefore, video cameras offer valuable support to make cities much safer for inhabitants of those cities.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the possible benefits of installing video surveillance in public areas are more significant than the negative effects.
- Some people feel that manufactures and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce to amount of packaging of goods While other argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packing Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Richer countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 84
- Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...als and to prevent crime. Specifically, a research that studied the rates of the offenders...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, as to, i suppose, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41580756014 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97591723994 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6185326311 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307594834922 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106032681027 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839589263295 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166292837798 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256851713873 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.