Some people think prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether offenders should devote their prison times serving the community as opposed to wasting it in jails have been a longing debatable topic. From my viewpoint, this policy might have positive impacts on both the nations and the criminals; however, it should be carefully carried out.
There is a whole host of justifications why this program will be beneficial. Firstly, it helps to reduce the stress on the government’s coffer, especially tackle the budget deficit and tax hikes problems. To be more specific, by forcing inmates to participate in community activities such as street cleaners or caregivers, the budget which used to be allocated to these sectors can be spent on other more prominent matters such as education and healthcare. Korea exemplifies this case very well as it is among the countries with the lowest crime rates, which has been acquired through the implication of the aforementioned policy. More interestingly, it also affects the rehabilitation of the prisoners, via mental effects. Through the progress of working inside the normal society, they are able to see life beyond the scope of their mind that might make them feel remorseful for their crimes. Thus, reducing the re-offend rates and orienting inmates to opt for a better life
However, such a delicate matter needs to be executed under strict observation and careful implementation. Firstly, this policy easily put the general public security at a disadvantage, for they are easy to be harmed by the culprits.In fact, some criminals are so dangerous that they may intentionally do harm to other people. So it is utterly vital to choose which offenders can partake in community service, and it demands flawless selection. Moreover, the working environment could generate the opportunity for the criminals to escape, since normally these works are done in an open area, and there might be insufficient administrators to supervise them.Thereby, the police force should consider deploying its ablest personnel for this program.
In conclusion, making lawbreakers serve their community has several virtues. Nevertheless, the implementation of such an approach should be supervised carefully by related parties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-22 | ramanhundal | 87 | view |
| 2020-10-22 | minhpov | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-08 | Ngaannie | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | lily2002 | 82 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | ravigujar123 | 72 | view |
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the use of other is rapidly declining It is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the best way to solve the problem is by providing schools and teachers Some others think that it is better to provide computers and Internet acces 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether offenders should devote their prison ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...on. Firstly, this policy easily put the general public security at a disadvantage, for they ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...y are easy to be harmed by the culprits.In fact, some criminals are so dangerous t...
^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thereby
...icient administrators to supervise them.Thereby, the police force should consider deplo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39193083573 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04565825126 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619596541787 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.346677443 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.642857143 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186595704761 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558663742437 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418646112113 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113095795829 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260761911104 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.