Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world, environmental issues have been one of the debating ones among people. In terms of these problems, reduced number of living species has been one of them. Some individuals claim that despite this difficulty, there have been lots of significant environmental issues which should be high on the agenda. While, others argue that the main issue has been the loss of specific species. I myself concur with the second opinion based on several reasons which will be clarified later.
To commence with, if some people do not recognize disappeared amount of living things as the core issue, it would have some causes. In their opinion, problems such as global warming or harmful effects of fossil fuels have been more significant that that problem. Since this issue may not have a direct consequence on people’s lifespan, but, for instance, air pollution and warm weather have been more tangible for individuals. As a result, actions for difficulties which every human could see their adverse results, should be taken first.
On the other hand, another reason has led other individuals to regard the mentioned problem as the main environmental one. By finding solution for this particular problem, they could solve other ones simultaneously. As in nature, all the aspects have been connected to each other, solving one issue may result in solving others. In fact, causes of that problem, could be loss of their habitat by human’s activities such as farming and also threat for their life by contamination of various parts of their food. Consequently, other issues would be solved by its solutions because of the similarity between their both causes and solutions.
In conclusion, regarding to both views, I myself consider all the ecological problems as important as each other, because not only have they been interacted, but also their horrible consequences would be reduced by applying solutions of one of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 11
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 56
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ues which should be high on the agenda. While, others argue that the main issue has b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19488817891 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71779280632 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5410406654 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182530232128 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710097677313 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516056946306 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114108542552 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227145706272 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.