Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage.
Both the author of the article and the lecturer's statements revolve around the problems that astronats have to face during their visit to the mars and the predicted solutions for them. The author profoundly believes there are three plausible hypotheses which all together attest that normous obstacles could prevent the human from travel to mars. However, the professor calls all the mentioned claims into question since they lack enough evidence to be considered credible. In fact, the professor believes there are several projected solutions for these problems and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point in the reading text.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states that compered to the moon mission, travel to mars could take at least two years and due to the limited weight of the spacecrafe, the astronats are not able to carry enough food.The professor repudiates this fallacious belief by reffering to more strong evidence. according to the lecturer, human can use hydroponic to cultivate food on the spaceship and by doing that, they can also reuse the water. Additionallly, she goes on to say that by growing plants, they can increase the oxygen level while reducing co2.So this hypothesis is excluded and not convincing.
Another hypothesis presented by the essayist, hold the idea that great medical problems can affect the astronats during their trip, because of th zero gravity environment; while, is not adequate to prove that human had face this problem logically. Nevertheless, The qrator explicitly addresses this point when she states that astronast already have the experience of living on the space station without gravity for a long time. She elaborates on this by bringing up the pont that by using the vitamines and doing regular exersises, astronats not only can maintain their muscular status, but also they can keep their bone density in a proper level. thus the secound claim is also ruled as the result of more decisive fact which is offered by the professor.
Finally, the author brings his arguments to a close by suggesting that travelers can damage severly by sun radiations.while he actually ignores one crucial fact. Not surperisingly, The lecturer takes issue with this calim by contending that the sientists had overcome this issue by inventing some equipments to decrease these radiations and also, providing a shield on the spaceship.He notes that by using these two protocols, they can pretected from sun radiation in it's harshest periods. Consequently, This hypothesis is also based on kwrong reason.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | saharmnd | 3 | view |
| 2022-12-10 | shekoo20 | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-16 | Braun | 80 | view |
| 2022-02-28 | starvingartist | 3 | view |
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 76
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 90
- How do movies and television influence people s behavior Give reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mar'.
Suggestion: mar
... could prevent the human from travel to mars. However, the professor calls all the m...
^^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mar'.
Suggestion: mar
...compered to the moon mission, travel to mars could take at least two years and due t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...onats are not able to carry enough food.The professor repudiates this fallacious be...
^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...f by reffering to more strong evidence. according to the lecturer, human can use hydropon...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...ase the oxygen level while reducing co2.So this hypothesis is excluded and not con...
^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...p their bone density in a proper level. thus the secound claim is also ruled as the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...p their bone density in a proper level. thus the secound claim is also ruled as the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...so, providing a shield on the spaceship.He notes that by using these two protocols...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, nevertheless, so, thus, while, at least, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1373.03311258 157% => OK
No of words: 413.0 270.72406181 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22276029056 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70633516222 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 145.348785872 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573849878935 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 419.366225166 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4552807206 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.071428571 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 21.698381199 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0774556205899 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265602856807 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0218407333865 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.048291624182 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018658080086 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 63.6247240618 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.