Nowadays, more and more people believed that overburden can help complete higher quality in achievements. For example, professional teachers, coaches believe that this applies to students and athletes, on the individual and national level. What is your point of view? Give examples to support it.
Recently, the phenomenon of completing higher quality in achievements by overburden and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of hard-working people are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that professional teachers can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, achieving higher qualities by overburden can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of individual and national levels, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of sophisticated athletes. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of experienced coaches are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, completed higher qualities by overburden can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of negligible achievements are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient students. Hence, predicted outcomes of inexperienced teachers are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of completed higher quality in achievements by overburden far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of considerate people prove the significance of an efficient coach, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-18 | vahidmetall | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-27 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
- Imagine you have been assigned to the study of climate change Which area of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 71
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent you agree Give example 11
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 85
- Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries 88
- What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93191489362 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38955870192 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8083529108 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.727272727 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256398019215 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788610704467 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06240158112 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140581316026 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179536830616 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.