The graph below gives information from a report about the purpose and frequency of Internet use by medical students in 2009 in one country.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the repetition of medical students who use the internet for different intention and also the proportion of them in 2009 in one region.
It is clear that the rate of medical students who use internet for all the given reasons from at least daily to never altered rapidly. Mostly, the number of therapeutic students who use internet weekly was the highest group with total 150 percent, whereas the students who use it daily was the lowest with total 53 percent. The proportion of student who use computer to checking email was the greatest in two group weekly and monthly (50 percent in weekly and 19% in monthly). Next, Remedial students who use the online network looking for the patient’s personal data at least daily and occasionally had the similar figure with 10 percent. There was a sharp increase in the percentage of students who use internet for chatting from everyday to weekly; but after that, it deteriorated significantly to 8 percent in monthly.
In conclusion, The group of students that use the online network weekly had the most enormous proportion, while the smallest belonged to the group who use it almost every day .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-28 | khangnguyen12345 | 88 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 67
- Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 64
- Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment Only governments and large companies can make a real difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- On balance advertising is more harmful than beneficial To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some think scientists should be allowed to send messages into space to communicate with other life forms while others believe this is too dangerous Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternet weekly was the highest group with total 150 percent, whereas the students ...
^^
Line 3, column 733, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ents who use internet for chatting from everyday to weekly; but after that, it deteriora...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significantly to 8 percent in monthly. In conclusion, The group of students tha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...to the group who use it almost every day .
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the group who use it almost every day .
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas, while, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94897959184 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63501164155 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 17.9352577173 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.571428571 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148222837255 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894836019758 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047823308881 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121187542628 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051629841273 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.